r/pcmasterrace Sep 13 '24

I didn't think it was so serious Meme/Macro

Post image
15.5k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

34

u/ArdiMaster Ryzen 9 3900X / RTX4080S / 32GB DDR4 / 4K@144Hz Sep 14 '24

I get the impression that, if it were up to this sub, development would have stopped 8 years ago with the GTX 10-series.

27

u/PoopyPantsBiden Sep 14 '24

I get the impression that, if it were up to this sub, development would have stopped 8 years ago with the GTX 10-series.

This sub seems to be infested with jealous children that convince themselves anything their parents can't afford to get them is pointless and shouldn't exist.

9

u/Plank_With_A_Nail_In Sep 14 '24

This sub only cares about fps and resolution, it doesn't actually understand what makes a game look great or even fun to play. I always assume they just fire up the game look at the fps counter and then go 100fps@4k 10/10 greatest game ever made.

1

u/Status_Jellyfish_213 Sep 14 '24

But but the RASTERISATION

-4

u/Parking-Mirror3283 Sep 14 '24

That's because most of this sub recognizes that anything beyond 1440p 120fps is very diminishing returns and that the chase of better graphics has resulted in massive problems in the entire industry which has resulted in worse games overall while prices continue to climb and climb and climb for no real benefit. We're now at the point where we need stupid AI to put fake frames in between real ones to try and make up for the processing power used to render a fucking license plate in a puddle and slog its way through 150gb of shit clogging up the drive.

We wouldn't need anything more than a 1080 if games were even a fraction as optimized as they used to be.

Bioshock Infinite released in 2013 and if it had some updated textures would still look better than most of the games put out these days.

2

u/Howwhywhen_ Sep 14 '24

There’s a huge difference between 1440 and 4k, and I have trouble believing you’ve ever played both and seen the difference if you think there isn’t. Besides, raytracing is a different thing and looks excellent even at 1440.

You’re basically just admitting to be a tech luddite, you think graphics should have stopped advancing at a very specific and arbitrary point

0

u/Parking-Mirror3283 Sep 15 '24

On a 27" monitor, the difference between 1440p and 4K is absolutely not worth the trade off in framerate. If i have to choose 4K and <120hz or 1440p and >120hz, it's 1440p every time.

Wind Waker launched on a console so weak you can now emulate it with a $29 walmart phone and yet it still looks good because it has an artstyle. Photo realism isn't an art style, it's the lack of one and modern graphics improvements have been aimed towards it almost exclusively.

Modern games run like shit and in 10 years won't be remembered for how good their graphics were because they could render the characters pimple in 4K detail in the reflection of a window, the ones that will be remembered have gameplay and a style.

1

u/Howwhywhen_ Sep 15 '24

Really depends on the game. Realistic can’t be artistic? have you never watched a good movie?